Curriculum Based Measurement
If you prefer, read the text-version of the infographic.
January, S. A. A., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2020). Universal screening in grades K-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early reading curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.007
Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tools are brief assessments that have several uses in school settings. They can be used for screening purposes and monitoring student progress in academic areas, including reading.
Authors (January & Klingbeil, 2020) summarized the validity evidence of early reading CBM tools for Kindergarten through Grade 2. The CBM tools in the review assessed onset sounds, letter naming, letter sounds, nonsense words, phoneme segmenting, and word identification.
Authors found that word identification (WI) and nonsense word (NW) skills had the strongest associations with reading achievement measures. This means students who scored well on WI and NW also did well on reading assessments that were longer and covered a wider range of reading skills.
To explore the NCIL free online CBM tool, go to: https://www.improvingliteracy.org/resource-repository/cbm-home
Suggested Citation
National Center on Improving Literacy (January, 2023). Curriculum Based Measurement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Improving Literacy. Retrieved from https://www.improvingliteracy.org.
References
January, S. A. A., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2020). Universal screening in grades K-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early reading curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.007
Abstract
Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tools are brief assessments that have several uses in school settings.
Related Resources
More on Screening
- Are Individual Differences in Response to Intervention Influenced by the Methods and Measures Used to Define Response?
- Best Practices in Universal Screening
- Characteristics of Students Identified with Dyslexia Within the Context of State Legislation
- Commonalities Across Definitions of Dyslexia
- Considerations in Universal Screening
The research reported here is funded by awards to the National Center on Improving Literacy from the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, in partnership with the Office of Special Education Programs (Award #: S283D160003). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of OESE, OSEP, or the U.S. Department of Education. Copyright © 2024 National Center on Improving Literacy. https://www.improvingliteracy.org